Webb v. Remington Arms Company et al

Filing 44

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); dft's motion to preclude is denied as moot (doc #28); pltf's request for leave to retain replacement expert is denied (doc #41); dft's motion for summary judgment is granted in full (doc #30); Clerk directed to enter final judgment in favor of the defendant and close this case; ORDER TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/5/16. (case closed) (see order for further/complete details) (lg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM MICHAEL WEBB,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
TAHSIN INDUSTRIAL CORP.,
U.S.A.,
Defendant.

No. 4:14-cv-01499

(Judge Brann)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of February 2016, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion to Preclude Testimony and Reports of Any of
Plaintiff’s Liabilty Experts, ECF No. 28, is DENIED AS MOOT,
given the decision by Plaintiff’s counsel, Robert Thompson
Rosamilia, Esquire, to withdraw Plaintiff’s sole expert at the Court’s
Daubert Hearing conducted on December 18, 2015.

2.

Plaintiff’s request for leave to retain a replacement expert—to the
extent that the arguments in Plaintiff’s brief, ECF No. 41, absent any
formal motion, might be liberally construed by this Court as so
demanding—is DENIED.

1

3.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 30, is
GRANTED IN FULL.

4.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the
Defendant and close this case.

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge

2