Meridian Security Insurance Company v. Flick et al

Filing 32

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks a declaration that the relevant excess clauses are mutually exclusive and that the insurers owe coverage on an equal shares basis, and it is DENIED in all other respects. 2. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED in its entirety. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the file on this case. (eo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : ADAM FLICK and STATE FARM : MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE : COMPANY, : : Defendants. : 4:14-cv-1532 Hon. John E. Jones III ORDER May 26, 2015 In accordance with the Memorandum issued on today’s date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks a declaration that the relevant excess clauses are mutually exclusive and that the insurers owe coverage on an equal shares basis, and it is DENIED in all other respects. 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is DENIED in its entirety. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the file on this case. s/ John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?