Fullman v. Kistler et al

Filing 8

ORDER: The September 9, 2014 report and recommendation 5 of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson is ADOPTED. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The clerk is directed to close the case file. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 12/3/2014. (km)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ISAAC KENNETH FULLMAN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS KING KISTLER, et. al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-1740 (Judge Brann) (Magistrate Judge Carlson) ORDER December 3, 2014 The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the September 9, 2014 report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson. ECF No. 5. Judge Carlson’s analysis is thorough; the Court will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff also sent a letter, ECF No. 7, requesting counsel, which is denied as moot, as this action is being dismissed. He also requested the form for petition of writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, this request was previously granted within the context of another of his cases, 4:14-CV-1739. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 1. The September 9, 2014 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson is ADOPTED. ECF No. 5. 2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). 3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?