Neblett v. Clairmont Paciello & Co., P.C. et al
Filing
61
ORDER (MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry) - DENYING Motion 51 to Change Venue filed by Mountjoy Chilton Medley LLP; SCHEDULING a Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference for 10/31/2016 10:00 AM before Honorable Matthew W. Brann. (See Order for complete details.)Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/5/2016. (km)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN P. NEBLETT, as Chapter 7
Trustee of VALLEY FORGE
COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CLAIRMONT PACIELLO & CO.,
P.C., MOUNTJOY CHILTON
MEDLEY LLP, MICHAEL DE
LEON HAWTHORNE and
THOMPSON COBURN LLP,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 4:15-cv-01622
(Judge Brann)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2016, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Mountjoy Chilton Medley, LLP’s Motion to Transfer
Venue, ECF No. 51, is DENIED.
-1-
2.
The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 Initial Case Management
Conference, previously scheduled for August 2, 2016, is rescheduled
for October 31, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
3.
Counsel are advised to comply with Local Rule 16.3, which requires
lead counsel for each party to meet prior to the management
conference and complete a “Joint Case Management Plan” form that
must be filed with the Court at least five (5) days prior to the initial
case management conference.
4.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the conference call. The Court may
be reached in chambers at 570‐323‐9772. At the time the call is
placed, all counsel shall be on the line and prepared to proceed.
5.
The Court’s preference is that counsel do not participate in
telephonic conference calls by cellular phone or other mobile device.
BY THE COURT:
/s Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?