Sheetz et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 88 ; Dft Wal-Mart Stores, East, L.P.s mtn in limine to exclude the testimony of Dr. Ronald DiSimone at trial 72 , is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, Pltfs are directed to produce Dr. DiSimones testimonial history within (14) days from the date of this Order.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/22/17. (ma)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICIA A. SHEETZ, et al.,
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, L.P.,
AND NOW, on this 22nd day of November 2017, in accordance with the Memorandum
filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, East,
L.P.’s motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Dr. Ronald DiSimone at trial pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1) (Doc. No. 72), is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED THAT, based upon the representation of Defendant that Plaintiffs Patricia A.
Sheetz and Richard H. Sheetz Jr. have not disclosed the testimonial history of Dr. DiSimone in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) (Doc. No. 72 at 12), Plaintiffs are
directed to produce Dr. DiSimone’s testimonial history within fourteen (14) days from the date
of this Order.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?