Rorke v. Aubrey Alexander Toyota et al
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 29 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall file an answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 28, within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/20/2017. (jn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AUBREY ALEXANDER, INC. and
AND NOW, this 20th day of September 2017, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 29, is DENIED.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants
shall file an answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF
No. 28, within 14 days of the date of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?