MCASSEY v. DISCOVERY MACHINE INC. et al

Filing 75

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson 67 ; 2. Defendants motion to dismiss 62 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;3. All claims asserted agai nst Defendant Vanessa Chapla are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Chapla from the caption of the above-captioned action; and 4. The above-captioned action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial management. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/21/18. (ve)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES MCASSEY, Plaintiff v. DISCOVERY MACHINE, INC., et al., Defendants : : : : : : : No. 4:16-cv-00705 (Judge Kane) (Magistrate Judge Carlson) ORDER Before the Court is the January 12, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. No. 67), in which he recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. No. 62). No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 21st day of August 2018, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. No. 67); 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 62), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. All claims asserted against Defendant Vanessa Chapla are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Chapla from the caption of the above-captioned action; and 4. The above-captioned action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial management. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?