Guerriero v. Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania et al
Filing
67
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 52) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 7/29/2019. (ktt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH PATRICK GUERRIERO,
Plaintiff
v.
LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO: 4:16-CV-00740
(Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab)
ORDER
July 29, 2019
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, IT IS
ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 52) is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. More specifically, the
defendants are granted summary judgment as to Guerriero’s claim based on not
being interviewed for or hired as the Athletic Director in 2015, and Guerriero’s
claim based on Dean Neun advising him that there was no way that he would
resume working in Athletics. At this time, however, we will not grant the
defendants summary judgment as to Guerriero’s claim based on not being invited
to the 25th Anniversary of the Clearfield branch campus. But IT IS ORDERED
that, on or before August 14, 2019, Guerriero shall show cause, if there is any, why
we should not grant the defendants summary judgment as to that last remaining
claim. To show cause, Guerriero must present summary-judgment evidence to
support that claim, and he shall brief the issues outlined in the Memorandum
Opinion. The Clerk of Court shall defer entering judgment until conclusion of the
case.
S/Susan E. Schwab
Susan E. Schwab
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?