Campbell et al v. Balon et al

Filing 56

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Auchter, Town of Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, Szkodny, Charles Balon, Roger F. VanLoan is GRANTED IN P ART, and DENIED IN PART; 36 Motion to Dismiss filed by John Berger, III is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART; 37 Motion to Dismiss filed by Marlene Butters is GRANTED; 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Jason Gregas is GRANTED; and 50 Motion to Dismiss filed by Chumley's Bar and Grille is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/6/2017. (See Order for further details.) (jn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRUCE M. CAMPBELL, and KIM L.: CAMPBELL, husband and wife, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : CHARLES BALON, individually as : police officer of the Bloomsburg : Police Department; OFFICER : AUCHTER, individually as police : Officer of Bloomsburg Police : Department; OFFICER SZKODNY, : Individually as police officer of the : Bloomsburg Police Department; : ROGER VANLOAN, individually as : Police chief of the Bloomsburg Police : Department; TOWN OF : BLOOMSBURG; CHUMLEY’S : BAR AND GRILLE, LLC, and : CAPITOL BG LLC, d/b/a CAPITOL : BAR AND GRILL a/k/a CAPITOL : RESTAURANT AND BAR; JOHN : BERGER, III, MARLENE : BUTTERS; and JOHN GREGAS, : : Defendants. : No. 4:16-CV-00779 (Judge Brann) ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of July 2017, in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion of this same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1. Defendants Charles Balon, Officer Auchter, Officer Szkodny, Roger F. VanLoan, and Town of Bloomsburg’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part; a. Count IV (Plaintiff BC’s Excessive Use of Force claim against Defendant Balon) is dismissed without prejudice; b. Count VIII ( Plaintiff BC’s Loss of Consortium against Defendants Balon and the Town of Bloomsburg) is dismissed with prejudice; c. Count IX (Plaintiff BC’s conspiracy claim against Defendants Balon, Szkodny, Butters, Gregas, and Capitol Bar and Grill) is dismissed without prejudice; d. Count X (Plaintiff KC’s Section 1983 claim against Defendant Balon) is dismissed with prejudice; e. Count XI (Plaintiff KC’s Loss of Consortium claim against Defendants Balon and the Town of Bloomsburg) is dismissed with prejudice; and f. Count XII (Plaintiff KC’s Section 1983 claim against Defendant Town of Bloomsburg) is dismissed with prejudice. 2. Defendant John Berger, III’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part; 2 a. Counts XVII & XVIII (Plaintiff KC’s intentional infliction of emotion distress claims against Defendants Berger and Capitol Bar and Grill) are dismissed with prejudice. 3. Defendant Marlene Butters’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED; 4. Defendant Jason Gregas’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED; 5. Defendant Chumley’s Bar and Grille’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 50) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; a. Counts XVII & XVIII (Plaintiff KC’s intentional infliction of emotion distress claims against Defendants Berger and Capitol Bar and Grill) are dismissed with prejudice. 6. Plaintiff BC is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within twentyone (21) days re-asserting the dismissed excessive force claim under Section 1983 against Defendant Balon, and the dismissed civil conspiracy claim under Section 1983 against Defendants Balon, Berger, Butters, Gregas, and Capitol Bar and Grill. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?