Kreiger v. Bank of America, N.A.
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER TERMINATING CASE: dft Bank of America's motion to dismiss amended complaint is granted; Counts I and II of pltf's complaint are dismissed with prejudice; the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count III of the complaint, without prejudice to pltf re-filing this state-law claim in state court; Clerk directed to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/17/17. (case closed)(lg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Case No. 4:16-CV-00830
January 17, 2017
AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.
2. Counts I and II of Plaintiff’s Complaint are dismissed with prejudice.
3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count III of
Plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing this state-law
claim in state court.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?