Emick v. Borough of Montoursville et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 2 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and the Clerk of Courts is directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/5/2017. (jn)

Download PDF
  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETER DELANCE EMICK, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF MONTOURSVILLE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : No.: 4:16-CV-01856 (Judge Brann) (Magistrate Judge Saporito) ORDER JUNE 5, 2017 Before the Court for disposition is a Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr. on May 12, 2017.1 In this Report, Magistrate Judge Saporito recommended that (1) Defendants Borough of Montoursville, and City of Williamsport’s pending motions to dismiss be granted; (2) Plaintiff Peter Delance Emick’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and (3) the Clerk be directed to close this case.2 No objections to this Report and Recommendation have since been filed. Upon designation, a magistrate judge may “conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and . . . submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of                                                              1 ECF No. 10. 2 Id. - 1-   fact and recommendations.”3 Once filed, this Report and Recommendation is disseminated to the parties in the case who then have the opportunity to file written objections.4 Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, the court should, as a matter of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”5 Nevertheless, whether timely objections are made or not, the district court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.6 Following independent review of the record, I am satisfied that the Report and Recommendation contains no clear facial error. In the interests of judicial economy, I will not rehash Magistrate Judge Saporito's sound reasoning and legal citation. The Court is in full agreement that Plaintiff Peter Delance Emick’s Complaint has failed to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and should be dismissed in its entirety. AND NOW, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr.’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;                                                              3 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 4 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). 5 Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)). 6 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.31. - 2-   2. Defendants Borough of Montoursville and City of Williamsport’s Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 2 & 3) are GRANTED; 3. The Clerk of Courts is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge   - 3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?