AutoTrakk, LLC v. Automotive Leasing Specialists et al

Filing 51

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#44] is granted in part and denied in part; Pursuant to FRCP 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/6/18. (lg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AUTOTRAKK, LLC, No. 4:16-CV-01981 Plaintiff. (Judge Brann) v. AUTOMOTIVE LEASING SPECIALISTS, INC., MICHAEL C. CAFFREY, GEORGE STAUFFER, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of February 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 44, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The motion is DENIED as to Counts I and II of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 40 ¶¶ 47-65. b. The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Count IV of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 40 ¶¶ 72-77. c. The motion is DENIED as to Count VI of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 4 ¶¶ 82-85. 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall answer Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?