Baker v. Benton Area School District et al

Filing 77

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 52 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Benton AreaSchool District, Coleen Genovese, Kelly Kocher, and Lindsay Rado is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN P ART. The 53 Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendant Columbia Montour Snyder Union Counties of Central Pennsylvania Service System is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate Order. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/29/2019. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHANIE BAKER, No. 4:16-CV-02311 Plaintiff, (Judge Brann) v. BENTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, COLUMBIA MONTOUR SNYDER UNION COUNTIES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA SERVICE SYSTEM, COLEEN GENOVESE, KELLY KOCHER, and LINDSAY RADO, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW this 29th day of October 2019, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendants Benton Area School District, Coleen Genovese, Kelly Kocher, and Lindsay Rado, July 8, 2019, ECF No. 52 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendant Columbia Montour Snyder Union Counties of Central Pennsylvania Service System, July 8, 2019, ECF No. 53 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 3. The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate Order. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge - 2 - 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?