Baker v. Benton Area School District et al
Filing
77
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 52 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Benton AreaSchool District, Coleen Genovese, Kelly Kocher, and Lindsay Rado is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN P ART. The 53 Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendant Columbia Montour Snyder Union Counties of Central Pennsylvania Service System is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate Order. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/29/2019. (jr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEPHANIE BAKER,
No. 4:16-CV-02311
Plaintiff,
(Judge Brann)
v.
BENTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,
COLUMBIA MONTOUR SNYDER
UNION COUNTIES OF CENTRAL
PENNSYLVANIA SERVICE
SYSTEM, COLEEN GENOVESE,
KELLY KOCHER, and
LINDSAY RADO,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW this 29th day of October 2019, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendants Benton Area
School District, Coleen Genovese, Kelly Kocher, and Lindsay Rado,
July 8, 2019, ECF No. 52 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED
IN PART.
2.
The Motion for Summary Judgment made by Defendant Columbia
Montour Snyder Union Counties of Central Pennsylvania Service
System, July 8, 2019, ECF No. 53 is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART.
3.
The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate
Order.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?