Van Putten v. Ebbert

Filing 6

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IFP granted for the sole purpose of filing this action.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/25/2017. (CASE CLOSED) (jn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARL VAN PUTTEN, Petitioner v. WARDEN EBBERT, Respondent : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-17-85 (Judge Brann) ORDER January 25, 2017 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner’s in forma pauperis application is GRANTED for the sole purpose of the filing of this action with this Court. 2. Van Putten’s habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as an unauthorized second or successive petition and for lack of jurisdiction. 1 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 4. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?