United States Of America v. Kline
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/22/2017. (jn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
HEATHER KLINE f/k/a HEATHER L. :
ECK,
:
:
Defendant.
:
No. 4:17-cv-00200
(Judge Brann)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUGUST 22, 2017
FINDINGS:
1.
On February 2, 2017, Plaintiff, the United States of America, filed its
Complaint in this action against the Defendant, Heather Kline f/k/a
Heather L. Eck, ECF No. 1;
2.
On April 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Service by Posting
Property and Certified Mail, ECF No. 4;
3.
The Court subsequently denied this Motion on May 15, 2017, but
granted Plaintiff leave to refile within forty-five days upon exhaustion
of good faith attempts at locating and serving Defendant, ECF No. 5;
4.
Plaintiff refiled this Motion on June 12, 2017 upon exhaustion of
remaining efforts to locate and serve Defendant, ECF No. 6, and by
Order dated June 13, 2017, this Court granted Plaintiff leave to serve
-1 -
Defendant by posting a copy of the summons and complaint on the
property to be foreclosed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(e)(1) and Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 430(a)
and 410(c)(2), ECF No. 7;
5.
Service of the Complaint was made upon the Defendant on June 21,
2017, ECF No. 8;
6.
The Defendant has since failed to timely answer Plaintiff’s
Complaint;
7.
On July 19, 2017, the Clerk of Court entered Default as to the
Defendant, ECF No. 13;
8.
On July 19, 2017, Plaintiff moved for entry of Default Judgment as to
the claims advanced in its Complaint against the Defendant, ECF No.
10;
9.
The Defendant has failed to make an appearance in this action;
10.
Plaintiff’s claim is for $ 91,522.84 plus interest accruing upon the
unpaid balance at a daily rate of $ 11.38 due on a May 8, 2003 loan
from the United States Department of Agriculture in the principal
amount of $61,093.42. ECF No. 10 at 2;
-2 -
11.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim “is for a sum certain or a sum that can
be made certain by computation” as contemplated by Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 55(b)(1);
12.
Counsel for Plaintiff swears that, upon reasonable investigation, the
Defendant is not believed to be presently in the military service of the
United States. ECF No. 12;
13.
On July 31, 2017, this Court issued a Notice and Order to Show
Cause, ECF No. 14, directing as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant, within twenty-one
(21) days of this Notice and Order to Show Cause and no later than
August 21, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., shall SHOW CAUSE as to why this
Court should not grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. In
the event that the Defendant fails to show cause, the Defendant is
NOTICED that this Court will grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment in full and will immediately award Plaintiff the entirety of
the relief it seeks.
14.
In that same Order, the Court further directed the Clerk of Court to
mail a copy of the same to the Defendant at the following address of
record:
Heather Kline
173 E. Main Street
Rebersburg, PA 16872
15.
The Clerk mailed a copy of the Notice and Order to Show Cause as
directed. ECF No. 11;
16.
As of today’s date, no response has been received from Defendant.
-3 -
CONCLUSION:
Plaintiff, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, is entitled to the entry of
default judgment, the Defendant, Heather Kline f/k/a Heather L. Eck, having
failed to show cause and having been noticed that this Court will grant Plaintiff’s
Motion for Default Judgment in full and will immediately award Plaintiff the
entirety of the relief it seeks in the event of such failure. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED. An appropriate Order
shall issue.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
-4 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?