Ramalingam v. Robert Packer Hospital/Guthrie Healthcare System Auxiliary et al

Filing 125

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT ISHEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants' 87 Motion in Limine to Dismiss Punitive Damages Under the Cause of Action for Tortious Interference with Contractual/Business Relations is DE NIED. Defendants' 89 Motion in Limine to Limit the Plaintiffs Damages Under the Remaining Causes of Actions and Prevent the Plaintiff from Presenting Evidence of Damages is DENIED. Defendants' 91 Motion in Limine to Preclude the Plainti ff from Presenting Evidence of Economic Loss is DENIED. Defendants' 93 Motion in Limine to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint Based on Failure of the Plaintiff to Produce Expert Testimony to Meet the Plaintiff's Burden Under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 10/13/2021. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA   SARAVANAN RAMALINGAM, M.D. No. 4:17-CV-00216 (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL/GUTHRIE MEDICAL SYSTEM AUXILIARY, ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL, THOMAS VANDERMEER, M.D., and BURT CAGIR, M.D. Defendants. ORDER OCTOBER 13, 2021 In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Dismiss Punitive Damages Under the Cause of Action for Tortious Interference with Contractual/Business Relations, Doc. 87, is DENIED. 2. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Limit the Plaintiff’s Damages Under the Remaining Causes of Actions and Prevent the Plaintiff from Presenting Evidence of Damages, Doc. 89, is DENIED. 3. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude the Plaintiff from Presenting Evidence of Economic Loss, Doc. 91, is DENIED. 4. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint Based on Failure of the Plaintiff to Produce Expert Testimony to Meet the Plaintiff’s Burden Under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, Doc. 93, is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?