MILTER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al

Filing 29

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER/COMPLETE DETAILS.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/12/2018. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 4:17-CV-00251 S. GEORGE MILTER and LISA MARIE LOGUIDICE, (Judge Brann) Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ORDER JUNE 12, 2018 1. The Motion to Dismiss filed by the United States of America and Noel Trusal, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Count I of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; b. Count II of Plaintiffs’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; c. Count III of Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Noel Trusal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; d. Count IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and e. Count VIII of Plaintiffs’ Complaint against the United States is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; f. Count VIII of Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Noel Trusal and the Unknown Medical Providers of the Federal Bureau of Prisons is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Plaintiffs may amend Counts II and VIII of their complaint to allege administrative exhaustion within 30 days of the date of this Order. 3. Whether or not Plaintiffs amend their complaint, Plaintiffs have 60 days from the date of this order to conduct discovery on the issue of administrative exhaustion ONLY. Within 30 days of the conclusion of that period of LIMITED discovery, Defendants may renew their motion for summary judgment regarding Count III of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?