Milbrand v. Miner et al
Filing
24
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)- IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants William Miner and Nathan Rhodes motion to dismiss Counts 1, 2 and 4 of Plaintiff William Milbrands amended complaint (Doc. No.19), is GRANTED. Counts 1, 2 and 4 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs pendent state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/24/18. (ve)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM MILBRAND,
Plaintiff
v.
WILLIAM MINER,
iudividually and in his official capacity,
and NATHAN RHODES, individually
and in his official capacity,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 4:17-cv-761
(Judge Kane)
ORDER
AND SO, on this 24th day of August 2018, in accordance with the accompanying
Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants William Miner and Nathan Rhodes’
motion to dismiss Counts 1, 2 and 4 of Plaintiff William Milbrand’s amended complaint (Doc.
No.19), is GRANTED. Counts 1, 2 and 4 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s pendent state law claim is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk is directed to CLOSE
this case.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?