DOE v. The Pennsylvania State University et al

Filing 48

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff's 11 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/18/2017. (jn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DOE, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE : UNIVERSITY, THE PENNSYLVANIA : STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF : TRUSTEES, ERIC J. BARRON, individually: and as agent for The Pennsylvania State : University, PAUL APICELLA, individually : and as agent for The Pennsylvania State : University, KAREN FELDBAUM, : individually and as agent for The : Pennsylvania State University, : KATHARINA MATIC, individually and as : Agent for The Pennsylvania State University, : : Defendants. : No. 17-CV-01315 (Judge Brann) ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of August 2017, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED; -1- 2. Penn State is immediately enjoined from enforcing its June 27, 2017 suspension and exclusion of Plaintiff, John Doe, from The Pennsylvania State University and the Penn State–Jefferson seven (7) year pre-med program. 3. Penn State shall immediately permit and assist the Plaintiff, John Doe, in registering for classes necessary for participation in the Penn State-Jefferson seven (7) year pre-med program for the Fall 2017 Semester which begins on August 21, 2017. Said registration and participation by Doe is to be effectuated in accordance with Penn State’s practice, utilized during the prior academic year, of separating Doe and Roe. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?