Gilmore et al v. Holland et al

Filing 29

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants motion 17 to dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs federal claim under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, et seq ., is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. The remaining state law claims asserted in Plaintiffs complaint 1 , (Counts I VII, IX and XI), are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Plaintiffs right to file an action asserting these claims in state court; and 4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 2/28/18. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN GILMORE, et al., Plaintiffs v. NEIL R. HOLLAND, M.D., et al., Defendants : : : : : : : No. 4:17-cv-01781 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 28th day of February 2018, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17), is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs’ federal claim under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, et seq., is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. The remaining state law claims asserted in Plaintiffs’ complaint (Doc. No. 1, Counts I – VII, IX and XI), are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Plaintiffs’ right to file an action asserting these claims in state court; and 4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?