Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts v. Global Tungsten & Powders Corporation et al

Filing 12

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant Global Tungsten & Powders Corporation's 5 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED; Plaintiff Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.'s Co mplaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff will have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order within which to file an amended complaint. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/1/2018. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER AND PARTS, INC., No. 4:17-CV-01948 (Judge Brann) Plaintiff. v. GLOBAL TUNGSTEN & POWDERS CORPORATION and DOES 1-10, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of February 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Global Tungsten & Powders Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc.’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 3. Plaintiff will have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order within which to file an amended complaint, to the extent it can do so consistent with diversity of citizenship jurisdictional requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In the event Plaintiff fails to file an amended -1 - pleading within the aforementioned timeframe, this civil action will be closed by further Order of Court. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?