Kula et al v. United States Of America

Filing 89

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 70 motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' 72 motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. Plaintiffs' 74 motion in limine is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' 76 motion in limine is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/23/2021. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIANNA APFELBAUM KULA, et al., No. 4:17-CV-02122 (Judge Brann) Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of April 2021, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s motion in limine (Doc. 70) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted to the extent it seeks exclusion of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (“NTSB”) determination of probable cause. It is denied as to the NTSB’s safety recommendations. 2. Plaintiffs’ motion in limine (Doc. 72) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. The motion is granted to the extent it seeks to exclude certain statements from Defendant’s expert report under Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 702.1 It is denied in all other respects. 3. Plaintiffs’ motion in limine (Doc. 74) is DENIED without prejudice. 4. Plaintiffs’ motion in limine (Doc. 76) is DENIED as moot. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge 1   The specific statements excluded as character evidence under Rule 404 are those referring to: (1) Mr. Apfelbaum’s generally hazardous attitudes; (2) his repeated failure of the Instrument Knowledge Test; (3) the fact that Mr. Apfelbaum was just “barely” certified; and (4) characterizations of Mr. Apfelbaum as an “autopilot junkie.” Also excluded under Rule 702 are any and all statements speaking to Mr. Apfelbaum’s subjective state of mind prior to and at the time of the accident. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?