Baylets-Holsinger v. The Pennsylvania State University
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's 16 Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety; granting 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend; case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/7/18. (lg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 4:18-CV-00060
ANTOINETTE A. BAYLETSHOLSINGER,
(Judge Brann)
Plaintiff.
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
JUNE 7, 2018
1.
Plaintiff initiated the above-captioned action by filing her Complaint on
January 9, 2018. ECF No. 1.
2.
Defendant moved to dismiss that complaint on March 19, 2018. ECF
No. 14.
3.
In a May 2, 2018 Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Martin
C. Carlson recommended granting Defendant’s motion. ECF No. 16.
4.
No objections were filed to that Report and Recommendation.
5.
This Court has reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and finds “no
clear error on the face of the record.”1
1
Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010).
6.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
a.
Magistrate Judge Carlson’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No.
16, is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;
b.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED;
c.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint, ECF No. 17, is
GRANTED;2 and
d.
This case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further
proceedings.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
United States District Judge
2
Plaintiff attached an Amended Complaint to this motion. Plaintiff is advised, however, to
file that document as a separate docket entry on ECF.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?