Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al

Filing 28

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's request for an injunction requiring The Pennsylvania State Univer sity to reinstate him as a student in good standing is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and All claims against Defendants Danny Shaha, Karen Feldbaum, and Spencer Peters are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; but Defendants' motion is otherwise DENIED. The Pennsylvania State University SHALL ANSWER Plaintiff's Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/21/2018. (jr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 4:18-CV-00164 JOHN DOE, (Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, DANNY SHAHA, KAREN FELDBAUM, and SPENCER PETERS, Defendants. ORDER AUGUST 21, 2018 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s request for an injunction requiring The Pennsylvania State University to reinstate him as a student in good standing is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and 2. All claims against Defendants Danny Shaha, Karen Feldbaum, and Spencer Peters are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; but 3. Defendants’ motion is otherwise DENIED. 4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), The Pennsylvania State University SHALL ANSWER Plaintiff’s Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?