Hill v. Havens, Shrawder

Filing 12

ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation 7 is adopted in part and rejected in part. The case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/29/18 (lg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL HILL, No. 4:18-CV-00212 Plaintiff. (Judge Brann) v. (Magistrate Judge Carlson) TPR. T.R. HAVENS, and TPR. BRANDON SHRAWDER, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2018, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson’s January 31, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part. The Report and Recommendation is adopted to the extent that it finds, pursuant to a preliminary review of this pro se complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), that Plaintiff’s original Complaint was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. The Report is rejected, however, to the extent that it calls for dismissal of this action without prejudice. Such an action is not needed in the instant matter. I note specifically that, following the issuance of the Report and -1 - Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an “Amended Complaint” correcting the deficiencies outlined with the Report and Recommendation. 2. This case is therefore REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?