Wilson v. Booher et al

Filing 70

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 49 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims against Defendant Brown for lack of personal involvement. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Section 1983 Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants Wain and Kauffman. Entry of judgment in accordance with the above paragraph is DEFERRED pending disposition of the remaining claim in this case. (See Order for further details) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 02/08/2023. (ea)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM WILSON, No. 4:20-CV-00682 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. LT. KAUFFMAN, LT. WIAN, and ERIN BROWN, Defendants. ORDER FEBRUARY 8, 2023 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 1   Defendants’ motion for summary judgment1 is GRANTED, in part and DENIED, in part, as follows: a. The motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims against Defendant Brown for lack of personal involvement. b. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Section 1983 Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants Wain and Kauffman. 2. Entry of judgment in accordance with the above paragraph is DEFERRED pending disposition of the remaining claim in this case. 3. Within thirty days of the date of this Order, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the Court whether they are amenable to having   Doc. 49. this case referred to the Court’s Prisoner Litigation Settlement Program. 4. Scheduling of trial and all pretrial deadlines shall be deferred pending the filing of the aforementioned joint status report. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?