The Pennsylvania State University v. Vintage Brand, LLC
Filing
195
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Vintage Brand's Daubert motion 93 is GRANTED and David Franklyn is prohibited from testifying at trial regarding Survey 1; Penn State's Daubert motion 95 is DENIED; Vintage Brand's 135 motion to strike is GRANTED as to Paragraphs 1, 5, and 114 of the SUMF, and Paragraph 15 and the first sentence of Paragraph 6 of Petulla's Declaration, but is DEFERRED in all other respects; Penn State's 141 motion to strike is GRA NTED as to Paragraphs 16 and 25 of Chad Hartvigson's Declaration, but DENIED in all other respects; Vintage Brand's second motion to strike 159 is GRANTED to the extent that the sentence "[t]he image on the left was most likely sour ced from a decal created by a third party around the early 1950s" is stricken from Paragraph 5 of Hartvigson's Supplemental Declaration, but is DENIED in all other respects; Vintage Brand's 110 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Penn State's 113 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate Order. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 2/6/2024. (jr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
UNIVERSITY,
No. 4:21-CV-01091
(Chief Judge Brann)
Plaintiff,
v.
VINTAGE BRAND, LLC;
SPORTSWEAR, INC., d/b/a PREP
SPORTSWEAR; CHAD
HARTVIGSON; ERIK
HARTVIGSON; and MICHELLE
YOUNG,
Defendants.
ORDER
FEBRUARY 6, 2024
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Vintage Brand’s Daubert motion (Doc. 93) is GRANTED and David
Franklyn is prohibited from testifying at trial regarding Survey 1;
2.
Penn State’s Daubert motion (Doc. 95) is DENIED;
3.
Vintage Brand’s motion to strike (Doc. 135) is GRANTED as to
Paragraphs 1, 5, and 114 of the SUMF, and Paragraph 15 and the first
sentence of Paragraph 6 of Petulla’s Declaration, but is DEFERRED
in all other respects;
4.
Penn State’s motion to strike (Doc. 141) is GRANTED as to
Paragraphs 16 and 25 of Chad Hartvigson’s Declaration, but DENIED
in all other respects;
5.
Vintage Brand’s second motion to strike (Doc. 159) is GRANTED to
the extent that the sentence “[t]he image on the left was most likely
sourced from a decal created by a third party around the early 1950s”
is stricken from Paragraph 5 of Hartvigson’s Supplemental Declaration,
but is DENIED in all other respects;
6.
Vintage Brand’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 110) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
7.
8.
a.
The motion is granted as to Counts 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the second
amended complaint, and judgment is entered in Vintage Brand’s
favor as to those counts; and
b.
The motion is denied as to Counts 1 and 7 of the second amended
complaint, and as to Counterclaim One.
Penn State’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 113) is GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part;
a.
The motion is granted as to Vintage Brand’s Affirmative
Defenses Seven and Eight, but only as to incontestable
registrations; and
b.
The motion is denied in all other respects.
The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference by separate
Order.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?