Holton v. Sage
ORDER: 1) The Report and Recommendation of MJ Arbuckle 9 is ADOPTED;2) Holtons Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 isDENIED;3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case; and4) Any appeal taken from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/2/22. (ma)
Case 4:22-cv-00212-SHR Document 10 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RUBEN C. HOLTON,
WARDEN J. SAGE,
Civil No. 4:22-CV-0212
(Judge Sylvia H. Rambo)
AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2022, upon consideration of the
magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9), to which no objections
have been filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the
face of the record, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac
Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)
(explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for
clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2) Holton’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is
3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case; and
4) Any appeal taken from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?