Twigg et al v. Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc. et al

Filing 118

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Corey Twigg's and Lori Twigg's 81 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.'s 82 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant Garware Technical F ibers, Ltd.'s 79 Motion in Limine to Preclude Opinion and Testimony of Stephen Pfriem is DENIED. Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.'s Motion in Limine to Preclude Opinion and Testimony of Dale Clark (Doc. 80 ) and Defendants Varsit y Brands Holding Co., Inc.'s, BSN Sports, LLC's,and Sport Supply Group, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 76 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. A Telephonic Status Conference with counsel of record will be scheduled by separate Order. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 3/7/2025 (ea)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
COREY TWIGG, et al.,

No. 4:23-CV-00067

Plaintiffs,

(Chief Judge Brann)

v.
VARSITY BRANDS HOLDING CO.,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
MARCH 7, 2025
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiffs Corey Twigg’s and Lori Twigg’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 81) is DENIED;

2.

Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 82) is DENIED;

3.

Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.’s Motion in Limine to
Preclude Opinion and Testimony of Stephen Pfriem (Doc. 79) is
DENIED; and

4.

Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.’s Motion in Limine to
Preclude Opinion and Testimony of Dale Clark (Doc. 80) and
Defendants Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc.’s, BSN Sports, LLC’s,

and Sport Supply Group, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
76) are GRANTED IN PART:
a.

Dale Clark’s testimony is limited as set forth in the Court’s
Memorandum Opinion;

b.

Defendant Garware Technical Fibers, Ltd.’s Motion in Limine
to Preclude Opinion and Testimony of Dale Clark (Doc. 80)
and Defendants Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc.’s, BSN
Sports, LLC’s, and Sport Supply Group, Inc.’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. 76) are OTHERWISE DENIED;
and

5.

A Telephonic Status Conference with counsel of record will be
scheduled by Separate Order.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
Chief United States District Judge