CARTER v. SHARTLE
Filing
23
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis filed by JAMES CARTER; adopting 21 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter as the Opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 11/22/2011. (sjs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES CARTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN IT. SHARTLE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
C.A. No. 09-66 ERIE
ORDER
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation ("R&R"), filed on July 6, 2011,
recommended that the Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 20) be
denied.
The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections.
Objections were filed by the petitioner on July 15, 2011. After de novo review, we adopt
Magistrate Judge Baxter's July 6, 2011 R&R as the Opinion of the Court.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED that said report and recommendation is adopted as the opinion of
the Court.
Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.
lsI Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
MAURICE B. COHILL, JR.
United States District Judge
cc:
Susan Paradise Baxter
U.S. Magistrate Judge
all parties of record _ _
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?