HANKINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 20th Day of June, 2011; IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Mayor James E. Sileo, Judge Steven P. Leskinen, and Edward Fike be, and hereby are, DISMISSED from this case due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 31, 2011 135 , is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 06/20/2011. (kas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT HANKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:09-cv-182-SJM-SPB
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff’s complaint in this civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court
on July 20, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise
Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on May 31, 2011
[135], recommends that Defendants Mayor James E. Sileo, Judge Steven P. Leskinen,
and Edward Fike be dismissed from this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff’s objections [137] were filed on June 17, 2011. After de novo review of the
complaint and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation,
the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 20th Day of June, 2011;
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Mayor James E. Sileo, Judge Steven P.
Leskinen, and Edward Fike be, and hereby are, DISMISSED from this case due to
Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
Page 1 of 2
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 31,
2011 [135], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
s/
Sean J. McLaughlin
SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN
United States District Judge
cm:
All parties of record
U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?