DUNBAR v. BARONE et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 63 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 67 Motion for Hearing. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Moving Defendants, ECF No. 56 is GRANTED and Summary Judgment is entere d in favor of the Moving Defendants and against Plaintiff. The pending motions filed by Plaintiff for a TRO, ECF No. 63 and for a Hearing, ECF No. 67 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 1/27/2012. The Clerk is to mark the case closed. (tmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARTY DECARLOS DUNBAR, Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) M. BARONE, E.J. WOJCIK, ) K.I. GRANLUND, M. OVERMYER, ) T. RISKUS, E. MONGELLUZZO, DUNCAN ) C. CUSTER, HALL, REITZ, FLOCKERZI, ) K.P. REISINGER, C. KENNEDY, ) ROBERT DOE, and JOHN DOE, ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 09-245 E Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly Re: ECF No. 56 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of January 2012, the Moving Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All pending motions are hereby DENIED as moot. The Clerk is to mark the case closed. BY THE COURT, /s/ Maureen P. Kelly MAUREEN P. KELLY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cc: MARTY DECARLOS DUNBAR CM-9649 SCI FOREST PO BOX 945 MARIENVILLE, PA 16239 All Counsel of Record via CM-EC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?