DUNBAR v. BARONE et al
Filing
76
ORDER granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 63 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 67 Motion for Hearing. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Moving Defendants, ECF No. 56 is GRANTED and Summary Judgment is entere d in favor of the Moving Defendants and against Plaintiff. The pending motions filed by Plaintiff for a TRO, ECF No. 63 and for a Hearing, ECF No. 67 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 1/27/2012. The Clerk is to mark the case closed. (tmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARTY DECARLOS DUNBAR,
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
M. BARONE, E.J. WOJCIK,
)
K.I. GRANLUND, M. OVERMYER,
)
T. RISKUS, E. MONGELLUZZO, DUNCAN )
C. CUSTER, HALL, REITZ, FLOCKERZI, )
K.P. REISINGER, C. KENNEDY,
)
ROBERT DOE, and JOHN DOE,
)
Defendants.
)
Civil Action No. 09-245 E
Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
Re: ECF No. 56
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of January 2012, the Moving Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment is GRANTED.
All pending motions are hereby DENIED as moot. The Clerk is to
mark the case closed.
BY THE COURT,
/s/ Maureen P. Kelly
MAUREEN P. KELLY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
cc:
MARTY DECARLOS DUNBAR
CM-9649
SCI FOREST
PO BOX 945
MARIENVILLE, PA 16239
All Counsel of Record via CM-EC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?