RAMOS v. WALSH et al

Filing 48

ORDER: Upon consideration of the Petitioner's 46 "Motion for Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation," which the Court has construed as an Appeal of the Magistrate Judge's Order dated October 12, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 46 "Motion for Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" is DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 11/3/2010. (rlh)

RAMOS v. WALSH et al

Doc. 48

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE ANTONIO RAMOS, Petitioner, v. JEROME WALSH, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 10-31 Erie

ORDER Presently pending before the Court is the Petitioner's "Motion for Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" [Doc. No. 46], which the Court has construed as an Appeal of the Magistrate Judge's Order dated October 12, 2010 [Doc. No. 43] directing him to file an amended petition. In his Appeal, the Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge's Order and requests that the Court accept his "current amended petition" set forth at [Doc. No. 22] as his amended petition. On November 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge vacated her Order dated October 12, 2010 in light of the Petitioner's request [Doc. No. 47]. Accordingly, the Petitioner's Appeal of the Magistrate Judge's Order dated October 12, 2010 is now moot. AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2010; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the "Motion for Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" [Doc. No. 46] is DISMISSED as moot.

s/

Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge

cm:

All parties of record Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com