LAUGHLIN v. PECK et al
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DOUG PETROFF, YOMAN, VALERIE HIEBNER, HARLOW, WEST, SHANNON RANDALL, ROD SHOWER, SUSAN SENCHAK, EMEKA IBEMERE, ARYERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 3/25/2013. (bb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DANIEL LAUGHLIN,
)
)
) Civil Action No. 10-213 E
vs.
)
) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly
MS. PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK
)
HENDERSON, EMEKA IBEMERE, SUSAN )
SENCHAK, SHANNON RANDALL,
)
VALERIE HIEBNER, LT ARYERS,
) Re: ECF No. 44
Defendants.
)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary
Judgment submitted on behalf of the Corrections Defendants and the response to the Motion
submitted by Plaintiff, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion filed contemporaneously with
this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion, [ECF No. 44] is granted .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure, if the Plaintiff wishes to appeal from this Order he or she must do so within
thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P., with the Clerk
of Court, United States District Court, 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Maureen P. Kelly
MAUREEN P. KELLY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
cc:
Daniel Laughlin
GR-6308
SCI Mercer
801 Butler Pike
Mercer, PA 16137
All counsel of record via CM/ECF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?