SCUTELLA v. CITY OF ERIE BUREAU OF POLICE et al
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 95 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Statement and denying without prejudice 96 Defendant's Motion in Limine. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum, the Court finds that it is i n the interests of justice to continue the jury trial in this matter until the Erie March 2015 trial term, which begins on March 2, 2015. It is further ORDERED that the pretrial statement filed by Plaintiff pro se on November 17, 2014 shall be stricken from the Record. An Amended Final Scheduling Order setting forth a new jury trial date, as well as other relevant dates, will issue FORTHWITH. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 12-9-14. (bfm )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
.JHEN SCUTELLA,
)
)
)
)
) Civil Action No. 11-198E
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF ERIE BUREAU OF
POLICE et aI.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff s Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing a Pretrial
Statement and Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Medical Evidence. Ajuty trial in this
matter is currently set for January 26, 2015.
From September 9,2011 when he initiated this lawsuit until November 19,2014, when
Plaintiffs current counsel, Courtlyn Roser-Jones and the law firm of ReedSmith LLP agreed to
represent him, Plaintiff Jhen Scutella has proceeded pro se. As is typical in civil cases with pro
se plaintiffs, it has been a slow process with a lot of extra work for all involved.
Given Ms. Roser-Jones and. ReedSmith LLP's recent appearance in this 3-year old
lawsuit, we find that it is in the interests ofjustice to continue the jury trial in this matter until the
Erie March 2015 trial term, which begins on March 2,2015. An Amended Final Scheduling
Order setting forth a new jury trial date, as well as other relevant dates, will issue FORTHWITH.
AND NOW, this qV::day of December, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
and DECREED that Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing a Pretrial Statement is
GRANTED, the Pretrial Statement filed by Plaintiffpro se on November 17,2014 shall be
stricken from the Record, and Plaintiff s counsel permitted additional time to file a new Pretrial
Statement on behalf of Plaintiff. The new deadline will be set forth in the Amended Final
Scheduling Order.
It is hereby FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that in light of this
Court striking Plaintiffs pro se Pretrial Statement, Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude
Medical Evidence is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the Defendants to raise any and all .
issues contained in their motion in limine anew once Plaintiffs counsel files a Pretrial Statement;
a new deadline for the filing of motion in limine will be set forth in the Amended Final
Scheduling Order.
~~Jf ~€vJg
!Lr,
,
Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?