BRADLEY v. BEAVER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL et al
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and a certificate of appealability is DENIED; adopting 26 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk is directed to mark the case closed. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 10/25/2012. (rlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERNEST HOWARD BRADLEY,
Petitioner,
v.
BEAVER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 11-201 Erie
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 12,
2011 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for
report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. '
636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 26], filed on
October 2, 2012, recommended that the Petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed fourteen (14)
days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo
review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation,
the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2012;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and a certificate of appealability is
DENIED.
The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 26] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed
on October 2, 2012, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
The Clerk is directed to mark the case closed.
1
s/
cm:
Sean J. McLaughlin
United States District Judge
All parties of record
Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?