MOORE v. ADAMS et al
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants is GRANTED; the Clerk of Courts is directed to terminate the following Defendants as parties to this action: Sauers, Deer, Grassmeyer, Andrako, Nurse Bell, and Nurse Matt; adopting 19 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 7/30/2013. (rlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUSTIN LATIK MOORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 12-177 Erie
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 2, 2012 and
was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and
recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1), and
Rule 72 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19], filed on July
8, 2013, recommended that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants [ECF No. 14] be
granted. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file
objections and no objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the
case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2013;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants [ECF
No. 14] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Courts is directed to terminate the following
Defendants as parties to this action: Sauers, Deer, Grassmeyer, Andrako, Nurse Bell,
and Nurse Matt.1
The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed
on July 8, 2013 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
1
Several claims and Defendants remain pending in this action. See [ECF No. 19] p. 18.
1
s/
cm:
Sean J. McLaughlin
Chief United States District Judge
All parties of record
Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?