HART v. ASTRUE
Filing
19
JUDGEMENT ORDER: 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by CHASTITY ANN HART is DENIED; 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL J. ASTRUE is GRANTED. it is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED thatfinal judgment of this Court is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, and against Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 1/23/14. (bfm )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHASTITY ANN HART,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 12-196E
JUDGMENT ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2014, the Court having separately ordered
that Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 12] is DENIED
and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF
#14] is GRANTED, it is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that
final judgment of this Court is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security, and against Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58.
S/Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
Senior District Court Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
)
SUE EATON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
Civil Action No. 10-258E
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER
)
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
ORDER
AND NOW, this ____ day of February, 2012, the Court having separately
Ordered that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF#9] is denied and
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 11] is granted,
It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that FINAL
JUDGMENT of this Court is entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.
_________________________
Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.
Senior District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?