HART v. ASTRUE

Filing 19

JUDGEMENT ORDER: 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by CHASTITY ANN HART is DENIED; 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL J. ASTRUE is GRANTED. it is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED thatfinal judgment of this Court is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, and against Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 1/23/14. (bfm )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHASTITY ANN HART, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 12-196E JUDGMENT ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2014, the Court having separately ordered that Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 12] is DENIED and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #14] is GRANTED, it is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that final judgment of this Court is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, and against Plaintiff Chastity Ann Hart pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. S/Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. Senior District Court Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) SUE EATON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 10-258E ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of February, 2012, the Court having separately Ordered that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF#9] is denied and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 11] is granted, It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that FINAL JUDGMENT of this Court is entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58. _________________________ Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. Senior District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?