MICHAELS v. ALEXANDRA

Filing 50

ORDER denying 28 Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents without prejudice as premature. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 7-11-13. (bfm )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARREN MICHAELS, Plaintiff, vs. BAJ ALEXANDRA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 12-219E ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents" [ECF #28]. At this stage in the proceedings, where the discovery period has not yet commenced, Defendants do not have any duty to turn over any documentation to Plaintiff. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion shall be denied as being premature. ~ AND NOW, this _ , '_th day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents [ECF #28] is DENIED without prejudice as premature. tM~~I, GfuU. Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. Senior District Court Judge t·

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?