UNITED REFINING COMPANY INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES et al v. MORRISON et al

Filing 40

ORDER: In accordance with the foregoing Memorandum Opinion filed simultaneously herewith 39 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MARK WILLIAM PRATT is GRANTED; the 15 Motion for Summar y Judgment filed by DALLAS Q. MORRISON is DENIED; JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Mark William Pratt and against Defendant Dallas Q. Morrison, with respect to all right, title and interest as the beneficiary in the account of James Jacobs with the United Refining Company Incentive Plan for Hourly Employees. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/22/2013. (rlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED REFINING COMPANY
INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN FOR
HOURLY EMPLOYEES and ROBERT
KAEMMERER, in his capacity as Plan
Administrator,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DALLAS Q. MORRISON, an individual,
and MARK WILLIAM PRATT, an
individual,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-238
Judge Nora Barry Fischer

ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2013, in accordance with the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
1. Defendant Mark William Pratt’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33)
is GRANTED;
2. Defendant Dallas Q. Morrison’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is
DENIED;
3. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Mark William Pratt and against
Defendant Dallas Q. Morrison, with respect to all right, title and interest as the beneficiary in the
account of James Jacobs with the United Refining Company Incentive Plan for Hourly
Employees.
s/Nora Barry Fischer
Nora Barry Fischer
United States District Judge

cc/ecf: All counsel of record.

1