MILES v. ASTRUE

Filing 14

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations 11 . Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/8/14. (slh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYL VANIA STEPHEN P. MILES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. AS TRUE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A.No.12-316Erie MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiffs complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December 20, 2012, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.c. ยง 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on November 26, 2013, recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.7) be denied, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.9) be granted, and the decision of the ALJ be affirmed. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff and Defendant by NEF. Objections were filed by the Plaintiff on 12113/2013; a Response to the Objections was filed 12/23/2013. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the. case, together with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this L day of January, 2014; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.7) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.9) is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is affirmed. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 26,2013, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. ~$~ D~.AMBROSE United States Senior District Judge cc: Susan Paradise Baxter U.S. Magistrate Judge all parties of record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?