ARTHURS v. RACE et al

Filing 81

ORDER granting 67 the Commonwealth Defendants' partial Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 79 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 23, 2015. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/5/2016. (smc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANNA ARTHURS, Plaintiff, v. THEODORE RACE, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 1:13-cv-6 MEMORANDUM ORDER This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 9, 2013, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on October 21, 2014, recommended that the Commonwealth Defendants’ partial motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 67] be granted, that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Shadle and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s supervisory liability claim, and that Defendant Shadle be terminated from this case. Service was made on all parties by ECF. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2016; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commonwealth Defendants’ partial motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 67] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 23, 2015, is adopted as the opinion of the court. /s/ Joy Flowers Conti JOY FLOWERS CONTI United States District Judge cc: Susan Paradise Baxter U.S. Magistrate Judge all parties of record ____

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?