ARTHURS v. ASTRUE
Filing
14
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/9/14. (ask)
,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANNA M. ARTHURS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASRUE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
C.A. No. 13-17 Erie
AMBROSE, Senior District Judge
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on January 15, 2013, and was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter
for report and
recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1), and Rules
72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on December 11, 2013,
recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.8) be denied, Defendant's
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) be granted, and the decision of the ALJ be
affirmed.
The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections.
Service was made on Plaintiff and Defendant by NEF.
No objections were filed.
After de novo
review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and
recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 9th Day of January, 2014, it is ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No.8) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 10) is GRANTED, and the decision of the ALJ is affirmed.
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated December 11, 2013,
is adopted as the opinion of the court.
~R~
United States Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?