GORE v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that that Defendants' motion for summary judgment 24 is granted, and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims in this case; that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated 11/2/16 39 is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/22/16. (jg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS E. GORE, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, ERIE
COUNTRY PENNSYLVANIA, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C.A. No. 14-224 Erie
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 25, 2014, and was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation
in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the
Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on
November 2, 2016, recommended that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 24]
be granted, and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all
claims in this case.
Service was made on all parties by ECF, and objections were due by
November 21, 2016.
No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and
documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is
entered:
AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
[ECF No. 24] is granted, and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against
Plaintiff on all claims in this case.
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 2,
2016, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.
s/Nora Barry Fischer
NORA BARRY FISCHER
United States District Judge
cc/ecf: Susan Paradise Baxter
U.S. Magistrate Judge
All parties of record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?