BEASON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 15

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 11 . Signed by Judge Barbara Rothstein on 10/12/17. (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

DARREN BEASON,

)
)
Petitioner
)
)
v.
)
)
)
)
ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________)

CA. NO.

16-297 Erie

15
16
17
18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Susan P. Baxter,
United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. No. 11. Magistrate Judge Baxter recommends that this Court

19
dismiss Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as time20
21

barred. Dkt. No. 14. Petitioner timely filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Dkt.

22

No. 14. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Objections thereto, the record of

23

this case, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby finds and concludes as follows:

24

(1)

25

On May 23, 2012, Petitioner was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie
County of one count of delivery of cocaine;

(2)

On July 12, 2012, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of 15 to 30 months
1

imprisonment, followed by 60 months of probation;

1
2
3

(3)

On October 17, 2013, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed his sentence;

(4)

On May 28, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied his petition for

4

allowance of appeal. Therefore, Petitioner’s sentence became final on August 26,

5

2014;

6

(5)

Petitioner filed the instant petition on January 12, 2017, well after the one-year

7
statute of limitations imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
8
of 1996 (“AEDPA”) expired;

9
10

(6)

Magistrate Judge Baxter reviewed the petition, noted its untimeliness, and provided

11

Petitioner with an opportunity to show cause why the petition should not be

12

summarily dismissed. Dkt. No. 8. Petitioner responded to the order to show cause

13

on June 12, 2017. Dkt. No. 9. Magistrate Judge Baxter reviewed the response and

14

concluded that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to equitable tolling

15
of the AEDPA statute of limitations and, therefore, issued the instant Report and
16
Recommendation, recommending that this Court dismiss the petition for writ of

17

habeas corpus.

18
19

(7)

20

This Court has reviewed Petitioner’s response to the show cause order, as well as
his Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court agrees that

21

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances or that he acted

22

diligently with respect to filing his petition. Therefore, equitable tolling of the

23
statute of limitations is not warranted in this case;

24
25

(8)

Petitioner attaches an “affidavit” to his Objections to the Report and
Recommendation, claiming that the document constitutes “newly discovered
2

evidence” that he did not commit the crime of which he is convicted [Dkt. No. 14,

1

last page];

2
3

(9)

The document states in its entirety: “Darren Beason did not make a sale out of the

4

vehicle of [illegible] on Oct 19 of 2010 on 9th a [illegible] at 12:08 pm.” The

5

signature on the document is illegible;

6

(10)

The Court is unable to ascertain from this document who made the statement,

7
whether the statement is based on personal knowledge, or whether the statement is
8
made by someone competent to testify on the matters stated. Nor is the statement

9
10

made under oath. Accordingly, the document does not constitute competent,

11

reliable evidence. See, e.g., 3 Am. Jur. 2d Affidavits § 20 (current through 2017)

12

(“To be legally sufficient, the affidavit should show affirmatively the affiant’s

13

competence to testify to the facts stated, and the allegation must directly and

14

unequivocally represent that the facts are true and within the personal knowledge

15
of the affiant. Affidavits that merely state conclusions rather than facts are
16
insufficient.”); F.R.C.P. 56(c)(4);

17
18

(11)

Thus, the Report and Recommendation is HEREBY GRANTED;

19

(12)

Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

20

(13)

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send copies of this Order to

21

Petitioner and Magistrate Judge Baxter.

22
23
24
25

3

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 12th day of October, 2017.

3
4
5

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

4