JACKSON v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 42 Motion for Relief of Judgment; adopting 43 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/3/2024. (lyk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HUBERT JACKSON, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 99-1793 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2024, upon consideration of: (1) petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 42), which appears to be his sixth Rule 60(b) motion filed in this case; (2) the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that the motion be denied (ECF No. 43), which the court has reviewed de novo; (3) petitioner’s objections (ECF No. 44); and (4) the Court having notified the petitioner on September 22, 2014 with respect to his third such motion that filing repetitious Rule 60(b) motions which reargue prior motions will result in the those motions being summarily denied (ECF No. 30); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s sixth Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 42) is DENIED. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the court. /s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti Senior United States District Judge cc: Hubert Jackson AJ-2373 SCI Somerset 1600 Walters Mill Road Somerset, PA 15510

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?