JACOBS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al

Filing 495

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 456 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 489 Report and Recommendations. 456 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED only as it relates to Defendant Dan Onorato. The M otion is DENIED as it relates to Defendants Robert Beveridge, Bozak, Dale Chapman, Crapis, Major Donnis, William Emerick, Kavals, Louis Leon, McCall, Robert Pindel, Ronald Pofi, Rubel, Ramon Rustin, and Stanton.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 489 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 1, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/14/2016. (smc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDRE JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE RICHARD USNER, DETECTIVE MICHAEL O’KEEFE, DAN ONORATO, WILLIAM EMERICK, RAMON RUSTIN, RONALD POFI, MAJOR DONNIS, LT. ACJ LOUIS LEON, DALE CHAPMAN, ROBERT BEVERIDGE, BOZAK, ROBBIE PINDEL, KAVALS, McCALL, STANTON, RUBEL, and CRAPIS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 08-470 Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ECF No. 456 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 456) is GRANTED only as it relates to Defendant Dan Onorato. The Motion is DENIED as it relates to Defendants Robert Beveridge, Bozak, Dale Chapman, Crapis, Major Donnis, William Emerick, Kavals, Louis Leon, McCall, Robert Pindel, Ronald Pofi, Rubel, Ramon Rustin, and Stanton. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 489) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 1, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the court. BY THE COURT /s/ Joy Flowers Conti JOY FLOWERS CONTI Chief United States District Judge cc: All counsel of record Via Electronic Mail

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?