JACOBS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
Filing
495
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 456 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 489 Report and Recommendations. 456 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED only as it relates to Defendant Dan Onorato. The M otion is DENIED as it relates to Defendants Robert Beveridge, Bozak, Dale Chapman, Crapis, Major Donnis, William Emerick, Kavals, Louis Leon, McCall, Robert Pindel, Ronald Pofi, Rubel, Ramon Rustin, and Stanton.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 489 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 1, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/14/2016. (smc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDRE JACOBS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DETECTIVE RICHARD USNER,
DETECTIVE MICHAEL O’KEEFE,
DAN ONORATO, WILLIAM EMERICK,
RAMON RUSTIN, RONALD POFI,
MAJOR DONNIS, LT. ACJ LOUIS LEON,
DALE CHAPMAN, ROBERT BEVERIDGE,
BOZAK, ROBBIE PINDEL, KAVALS,
McCALL, STANTON, RUBEL, and CRAPIS,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 08-470
Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
ECF No. 456
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying memorandum opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 456) is GRANTED only as it relates to Defendant Dan Onorato. The
Motion is DENIED as it relates to Defendants Robert Beveridge, Bozak, Dale Chapman, Crapis,
Major Donnis, William Emerick, Kavals, Louis Leon, McCall, Robert Pindel, Ronald Pofi,
Rubel, Ramon Rustin, and Stanton.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 489) of
Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 1, 2016, is adopted as the opinion of the court.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Joy Flowers Conti
JOY FLOWERS CONTI
Chief United States District Judge
cc:
All counsel of record
Via Electronic Mail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?