HINTON v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Filing 50
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; For the reasons set forth in the memorandum, it is a question for the jury whether, in retaliation for plaintiff filing a complaint with the EEOC in early Jan uary of 2007, defendant placed plaintiff on limited duty status in January of 2007 and delayed in returning him to full-duty status until April of 2007, when plaintiff had been cleared by a physician to return to full-duty status as of February 26, 2007. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 8/30/10. (map)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
