GLOVER v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al
Filing
593
ORDER adopting 584 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled as not arbitrary or contrary to law. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 6/18/2013. (sps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARY E. GLOVER,
individually and on behalf
of other similarly situated
former and current
homeowners in Pennsylvania,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civil No. 08-990
)
)
MARK 1. UDREN, UDREN L A W )
OFFICES, P.c., WELLS FARGO
)
HOME MORTGAGE, GOLDMAN SACHS
)
MORTGAGE COMPANY
)
)
Defendants.
)
ORDER
AND NOW, this
/El.?a
y of June, 20l3, after Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend this
Court's Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292(b) to Certify Two Controlling Questions of Law to
the [Court of Appeals for the] Third Circuit [ECF No. 569], and after a Report and
Recommendation [ECF No. 584] was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the
parties fourteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and after
plaintiff filed objections [ECF No. 586], and defendants, Wells Fargo Horne Mortgage and
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company filed their respective responses [ECF No. 591, 592], and
upon independent review of the Motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 584], which is adopted as the Opinion of this
Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections [ECF No. 586] are OVERRULED
as not arbitrary or contrary to law.
Donetta W. Ambrose
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?