GLOVER v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al

Filing 593

ORDER adopting 584 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled as not arbitrary or contrary to law. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 6/18/2013. (sps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARY E. GLOVER, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated former and current homeowners in Pennsylvania, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. Civil No. 08-990 ) ) MARK 1. UDREN, UDREN L A W ) OFFICES, P.c., WELLS FARGO ) HOME MORTGAGE, GOLDMAN SACHS ) MORTGAGE COMPANY ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER AND NOW, this /El.?a y of June, 20l3, after Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend this Court's Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292(b) to Certify Two Controlling Questions of Law to the [Court of Appeals for the] Third Circuit [ECF No. 569], and after a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 584] was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties fourteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and after plaintiff filed objections [ECF No. 586], and defendants, Wells Fargo Horne Mortgage and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company filed their respective responses [ECF No. 591, 592], and upon independent review of the Motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 584], which is adopted as the Opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections [ECF No. 586] are OVERRULED as not arbitrary or contrary to law. Donetta W. Ambrose United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?