BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/3/2008. (kly) Modified on 10/9/2008. (tt, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEMETRIUS BAILEY, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 08-1115 Judge McVerry Magistrate Judge Bissoon
MEMORANDUM ORDER Demetrius Bailey's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on August 8, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on September 17, 2008, recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Bailey be dismissed and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed Bailey
ten days from the date of service to file objections. filed objections on September 26, 2008.
After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Demetrius Bailey is dismissed, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon, (Doc. 7), dated September 17, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the court.
s/Terrence F. McVerry Terrence F. McVerry U.S. District Court Judge
cc: DEMETRIUS BAILEY CP-7819 SCI at Greene 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370 Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?